How are cpus actually made

How are cpus actually made

Jul 12, 2020 – A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?

How are cpus actually made

Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks

Jul 5, 2020 – Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.

How are cpus actually made

Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?

Jun 23, 2020 – Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.

How are cpus actually made

Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?

Jun 11, 2020 – Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.

How are cpus actually made

How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU

Jun 2, 2020 – How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.

With more than 100,000 benchmarks researched from the web’s most reliable tech enthusiasts, we have developed a database to help classify processors based on their performance. Mathematical models, developed with a proven 90% accuracy, have been utilized to help approximate lesser known processor performance metrics, while well known processors’ performances have been validated against multiple benchmark sources to ensure validity. With the extreme amount of our cross checking and parsing down to the important statistics, we have done all of the heavy lifting for you.

When determining how to display the data in our CPU comparison tool, we focused our efforts on the main areas of usage for the processors, rather than showing numbers that may not be meaningful. A scoring system is useful only if it can reflect real use scenarios that the user expects from the CPU. Our industry experts were able to boil everything down to the statistics that matter most to our builders. Using a mix of our extensive data collection along with real-world experience, we have developed the scoring system to be extremely simple and extremely effective.

The CPUs are reviewed and compared on the key aspects and use cases that include gaming impact, streaming impact, office work impact, photo editing and video editing, as well as video encoding and general system benchmarks. On every benchmark, relevant processors are shown so it provides the user with an idea of where the current CPU sits against competition. With significantly more data analyzed than any of our competitors, you can rest assured knowing our comparison factors can be trusted and actually used to assist you.

Using our Compare CPUs page, up to eight different processors can be compared at once. Due to the large amount of benchmarks, the page navigation is broken down into sections to help you focus on your target needs. This user friendly design provides all builders with the opportunity to hone in on all metrics needed to compare CPUs, and ultimately, allow them to choose the best processor in a shorter amount of time than ever before.

There are more ways to fine tune gaming, bottlenecks, and streaming benchmarks as the current GPU can be changed, as well as the resolution and the quality settings.

Additionally, we have a lot of thoughts on the best gaming CPUs, so be sure to check out our CPU rankings page, where list the best CPUs in both productivity and gaming.

How are cpus actually made

RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison

Sep 03, 2020 – Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?

How are cpus actually made

10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs

May 23, 2020 – The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X’s capabilities.

How are cpus actually made

10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 22, 2020 – Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X’s capabilities.

How are cpus actually made

10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis

May 21, 2020 – 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.

How are cpus actually made

2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?

May 21, 2020 – In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel’s latest.

Our Best Picks for Desktop CPUs

If you’re after the best processor for work, a lot comes down to just what your work is. Most processors can handle just about any workload you throw at them, given enough time. But faster CPUs (with more cores and / or faster clock speeds) chew through tough workloads in much less time, making them great CPUs for productivity.

A processor that excels at gaming isn’t always the best CPU if your workload is productivity focused. In fact, as highly threaded CPUs become more common, gaming CPUs and work CPUs are increasingly different silicon beasts, making it tougher to choose which CPU is the best for your workload. So we’ve compiled a list of processors that represent the best bang for your buck in common productivity tasks, based on our years of benchmarking and testing data. For many who want to just get to gaming, it makes more sense to spend a little more and buy a higher-end chip, rather than spending money on a higher-end cooler and spending lots of time tweaking to achieve slightly higher performance.

With the Intel 10th Gen i5 10600K processor, Intel has upped their game and brought the competition closer in the productivity segment. Though AMD is still strongly competing in terms of price-to-performance value. The rumored Ryzen XT processors are interesting and may close the gaming performance gap between Intel and AMD.

When shopping for the best gaming CPU, you’ll want to balance performance and features with your PC budget. Our tips and picks below will help you choose the best CPU for gaming. You can also see how all of these processors stack up in our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy. But for detailed help on picking the best processor for your gaming rig, you can check out our 2021 CPU Buying Guide. And if you’re on the fence about which CPU company to go with, our AMD vs. Intel feature dives deep and comes up with a winner.

If you’re looking for the fastest gaming chip on the market, you need to look at our review of the Core i9-12900K and Core i5-12600K. The $589 Intel Core i9-12900K delivers incredible levels of threaded performance, often rivaling or beating the $799 Ryzen 9 5950X, but at a much lower price point. That type of performance will pay off in all manner of heavily-threaded productivity applications. If you’re looking for snappy performance in lighter fare, it’s also the uncontested leader in x86 single-threaded performance.

However, the Core i7-12700K offers essentially the same gaming performance as the $589 flagship Core i9-12900K — but for $180 less. That’s quite the value if you’re primarily interested in gaming. The 12900K serves up extra cores and extra boost speed for those looking for the utmost in productivity performance, but the Core i7-12700K is a well-rounded chip that provides an impressive blend of pricing and performance in both gaming and applications.

The $289 Intel Core i5-12600K is easily the best CPU for gaming in its $260 to $289 price bracket, which is where most gamers shop. The 12600K is truly the mainstream gamer’s chip, with up to 38% more threaded performance than the Ryzen 5 5600X and 7% more than the Ryzen 7 5800X. Coupled with the snappy single-threaded performance, this is the mainstream gaming chip to beat.

If you’re looking for the quick blow-by-blow, you can see both of these chips in dedicated head-to-head comparisons in our recent faceoffs:

AMD’s Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600G APUs also came to market recently, shaking up the entry-level graphics scene. The duo has the fastest integrated GPU on the market, offering nearly twice the performance of Intel’s integrated graphics. The Ryzen 5000G series is now the uncontested champ for extreme budget gaming, small form factor, and HTPC rigs. The 5000G could also slot in as a temporary solution for enthusiasts that can’t find a graphics card at reasonable pricing during these times of severe graphics cards shortages.

However, the Ryzen 5 5600G, which now joins our list of Best CPUs for Gaming, is the best pick for that task. The $259 Ryzen 5 5600G’s iGPU performance lands within 4% of the $359 Ryzen 7 5700G, but for 30% less cash, making it the best value APU for gaming on the market. We also recently tested the Ryzen 3 5300G, but that chip remains OEM-exclusive, meaning that you can’t buy it at retail.

Our AMD Zen 3 Ryzen 5000 article has all the details on AMD’s latest CPUs, but you can check our full lineup of detailed reviews of each model, like the Ryzen 9 5950X and Ryzen 9 5900X, Ryzen 7 5800X, and Ryzen 5 5600X for the detailed rundown.

AMD also has its new CPUs with 3D V-Cache headed to production later this year. Those chips will bring up to 15% more gaming performance courtesy of up to an almost-unthinkable 192MB of L3 cache bolted onto a souped-up Zen 3 processor. So as you can imagine, it won’t be long before we have the full scoop on performance.

Best CPUs for Gaming at a glance (more info below):

High Performance Value Best CPU for Gaming:
Intel Core i9-12900K
Alternate: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X

Overall Value Best CPU for Gaming:
Intel Core i7-12700K
Alternate: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Mid-Range Best CPU for Gaming:
Intel Core i5-11400

Budget Best CPU for Gaming:
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

Entry-Level Best CPU for Gaming:

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Choosing the Best Gaming CPU for You

For a list of all processors by performance, check out our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy for CPU comparisons backed by processor benchmarks. We also maintain a list of best CPUs for workstations, for those who frequently tackle high-end content creation, or other tasks that benefit from high core counts. Higher-end chips benefit the most from the best thermal paste, so check out our guide if you’re shopping for a new processor. But if you’re after the best gaming CPU, you’re in the right place.

If your main goal is gaming, you of course can’t forget about the graphics card. Getting the best possible gaming CPU won’t help you much if your GPU is under-powered and/or out of date. So be sure to check out Best Graphics Cards page, as well as our GPU Benchmarks Hierarchy to make sure you have the right card for the level of gaming you’re looking to achieve.

No matter if you’re multitasking for work, video editing, or gaming, get one of the best processors of 2021 to help you out. While weaker CPUs can handle more basic and day-to-day workloads, you need one of the more powerful ones to not only do those demanding computing tasks but to also stay cool while doing them.

The processor acts as the computer’s brain, running all of its processes, commands, and tasks. So, asking it to do intensive tasks when you have one of mediocre quality is going to end in a lot of disappointment and frustration, whether you’re upgrading or building a new PC. Thankfully, since Intel and AMD have been fighting for dominance in the processor realm, there are plenty of fantastic options at pretty reasonable prices.

You don’t have to compromise for lesser chips even if you’re on a budget thanks to options that have both plenty of performance on tap and a manageable price tag, such as the Comet Lake-S and the Ryzen 5000. And, to help you figure which one is right for you, we’ve picked the best processors available right now for powering through your creative workloads, playing the best PC games, and more.

What’s the best processor for gaming?

One of the best processors on the market today, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, combines excellent single-core performance and a massively improved multi-core one with its low power consumption and a fairly approachable price. And, it’s a strong option for gaming.

Scratch that: it’s arguably the best processor for gaming. It even beats out the Intel Core i9-10900K in Total War: Three Kingdoms, a game optimized for Intel hardware, by 7%. Based on AMD’s 7nm manufacturing process, its Core Die (CCD) design allows for one Core Complex per die. That means every Ryzen 7 5800X’s CCX has 8 cores, each of which direct access to 32MB of L3 cache, resulting in a breathtaking gaming performance.

The CPU, or central processing unit, is one of the most important components of a PC. Choosing the right processor is a complex decision to make, but let it be known that buying the best CPUs is crucial as it plays an intricate role in deciding how well your PC performs in different workloads, how well it runs games and more. We already have an elaborate list of the best CPUs you can buy, but it’s mostly populated with AMD CPUs with very few Intel options. Well, we haven’t had a ton of Intel processors worthy of taking the top spots in our recommendation list due to AMD’s stomping power, but that changed with the arrival of the 12th-generation Alder Lake platform. In this article, we’ll be taking a look at the best Intel CPUs you can buy in 2021.

You can also check out our list of the best CPUs for gaming if you’re looking to build a gaming rig. We have a good mix of both Intel and AMD options in there. However, if you’re hellbent on building an Intel-based PC, then you’ve landed on the right page. We’ve added a handful of Intel CPUs to this list to make sure we’re covering multiple categories across different price points. Let’s get started with the list:

Navigate this article:

Best Intel CPU for gaming: Intel Core i5-12600K

How are cpus actually made

The Intel Core i5-12600K is the best value gaming CPU available right now. It offers a huge leap in performance compared to its last-gen counterpart. Notably, it also boasts future-proof features as support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0. These features are yet to be supported by AMD chips, so the new Intel chip is an outright winner in that regard. The Core i5-12600K also packs a respectable multi-core performance, something which Intel’s been known to fall behind compared to AMD chips. Clearly, a lot has changed this time around and Intel appears to have put its best step forward with the new Alder Lake chips.

The best thing about the Core i5-12600K is that it benefits from many of the same upgrades as the more powerful Core i9-12900K chip. Most notably, we’re looking at a hybrid architecture that allows Intel to incorporate two different types of the core into this chip. We’ve seen such behaviour with ARM-based processors, but Intel is using it for the Alder Lake desktop chips. The Core i5-12600K, in particular, features 6 P-cores that focus specifically on single-core workloads such as gaming. Additionally, you also get 4 E-cores that are better equipped at handling sustained tasks to boost multi-threading performance.

The Intel Core i5-12600K has a total of 10 cores and 16 threads. You’re looking at a base clock of 3.70GHz and a boost clock of 4.90GHz. These frequency speeds aren’t significantly better compared to the previous-gen Core i5, but we do have more cores and they’re well-equipped to handle different workloads. It also improves the overall efficiency of the processor, in which the Intel Thread Director plays a huge role. It’s capable of assigning workloads to the relevant core.

The support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 further raises the performance ceiling. DDR5 memory offers a huge benefit in terms of memory speeds, whereas PCIe 5.0 doubles the bandwidth for supported components such as SSDs. DDR5 is still very much in its infancy, so they’re very difficult to come by. Not to mention, the existing DDR5 kits are quite expensive. Things are expected to settle by the time AMD brings the new AM5 platform.

As we’ve mentioned in our full review of the Intel Core i5-12600K processor, you’ll need a new motherboard with a Z690 chipset in order to get this new chip up and running. This, obviously, adds to the overall cost of setting up a new Alder Lake PC. And the addition of a DDR5 lens will further increase the entry cost for the Alder Lake chip. If you have enough money burning a hole in your pockets, though, then you can’t possibly go wrong with the Intel Core i5-12600K. In fact, we think this is the best chip in the Alder Lake series so far, it’s the one we think most people should be buying as opposed to going all the way to up to an i9-12900K.

Intel Core i5-12600K will serve you well regardless of the workloads and it’ll continue to do so for many years to come. That’s due to the support for future-proof features as mentioned earlier. Not to mention, you can also overclock this CPU to get even more performance out of it.

Rocket Lake just gets better the fewer cores you throw at it.

By Dave James published 10 June 21

Our Verdict

Intel’s best chips are its budget chips, especially when you put them head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen competition. But these are strange hardware times, and the version of the 11400 with graphics is actually the cheaper CPU.

  • Matches top-end gaming performance
  • Six cores and 12 threads
  • Should come cheap

Against

  • Weirdly overpriced right now

PC Gamer Verdict

Intel’s best chips are its budget chips, especially when you put them head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen competition. But these are strange hardware times, and the version of the 11400 with graphics is actually the cheaper CPU.

  • + Matches top-end gaming performance
  • + Six cores and 12 threads
  • + Should come cheap
  • – Weirdly overpriced right now

The Intel Core i5 11400F is one of the best of the latest 11th Gen desktop CPUs, and it’s also one of the cheaper six-core, 12-thread processors you’ll find. For half the price of the equivalently core-happy AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, you’re certainly not getting half the gaming performance.

So yes, it has actually happened; Bizarro CPU World has come to pass. This strange new reality is one where the dominant processor player is AMD, with the most expensive, most powerful chips available to PC gamers, and Intel is the one providing the budget alternatives that punch way above their weight class.

This is a turnaround of epyc proportions :smug face:

That ‘F’ suffix in the Core i5 11400F denotes a lack of iGPU in the processor package, which is no bad thing for a budget gaming CPU, and normally means a cheaper chip. Times are strange, however, and the Core i5 11400 is exactly the same CPU but with those integrated GPU cores enabled. It should be more expensive, but is actually available for a lot less right now.

Performance should be practically the same between the two so you can almost pick which of those two versions of the 11400 silicon is cheapest and be happy with your choice. Because the Core i5 11400/F is a great budget gaming CPU.

As a CPU generation itself, however, Rocket Lake has felt kind of lacklustre. The top-end Core i9 11900K is a chip that only its parents could love. It offers fewer cores than its erstwhile Core i9 compatriot and features the bastardised Cypress Cove core architecture that pulled the 10nm Sunny Cove core back into the arms of 14nm manufacturing.

This backport resulted in a bigger slice of silicon and meant it couldn’t fit the previous generation’s ten-core maximum into the top Rocket Lake chip, and if nothing else that made it feel like tangibly worse value.

But what Cypress Cove does deliver is higher IPC, and that has led to higher gaming performance across the board compared with previous Intel desktop chips. Though up top, considering what you’re missing out on compared with either the Core i9 10900K or Ryzen 9 5900X, the boon of higher gaming performance doesn’t make up for genuine lack in multithreaded grunt.

Lower down the stack, however, it’s a different matter. The Core i5 11600K is a great little chip, far cheaper and at least as effective a gaming chip as the popular Ryzen 5 5600X. Take the power shackles off in your BIOS, forgetting the dire situation we’ve put the planet in, and you can squeeze even more performance out of the chip.

Even if it was the same price as the six-core Ryzen the Core i5 11600K would still look good.

CPU generation: 11th Gen
Codename: Rocket Lake
Lithography: 14nm
Cores: 6
Threads: 12
Base clock speed: 2.6GHz
Max Turbo Frequency: 4.4GHz
Cache: 12MB
TDP: 65W

The Core i5 11400F just takes it that little bit further. It’s cheaper still, has the same six-core, 12-thread design—thanks to Intel finally lifting the artificial Hyper-Threading embargo—and can still hit a healthy 4.2GHz all-core Turbo clock speed. If you stick to the Intel recommended limits that will only last a few seconds, but most motherboards give you the option to let the silicon run at its limits.

Letting our Asus test board take care of the power limits, however, means a constant 4.2GHz under full load. That blows the old Core i5 10400F out of the water in multi-threaded performance and means it’s not far off either the 11600K or the 5600X.

But if serious multi-core rendering performance is a big thing for you then chances are that you’ll be up for spending more on something with a bit more grunt. What the i5 11400/F chips are about is budget gaming prowess with a decent enough thread-count to ensure you’re not left out further down the line.

I’m not saying that jamming a six-core CPU into your rig is necessarily future-proofing, yet since Intel allowed Hyper-Threading throughout the range even its budget chips have enough processing grunt inside them to not only deliver excellent gaming frame rates, but also offer a modicum of compute power too.

How are cpus actually made
How are cpus actually made Intel Alder Lake Mobile Team – Credit: GB, Intel

Intel 14th Gen Meteor Lake Processors Pictured

The other bit of news concerns Intel’s 14th-generation chips. That’s right, we’re skipping Raptor Lake for the moment. If you follow the news on this kind of thing, you may recall that Intel is building two gigantic fabs in Arizona. These will complement the bleeding-edge fabrication facility already in production there. The chip giant allowed c|net to take a rare tour of its facilities, and the company has a handful of high-resolution images from the inside of the fab.

How are cpus actually made

Intel Meteor Lake – Credit: CNet, Stephen Shankland

You can head over to the C|net article to see all the images, but the one at the top of this article might be the most interesting for our purposes. It depicts a test package for Meteor Lake. There’s no functional processor silicon there; these are strictly electrical test samples to make sure Intel’s Foveros packaging is functioning correctly.

Still, the image is intriguing. We already knew that Intel was moving toward a chiplet-based design for all of its upcoming processors within the next few years, but seeing the Meteor Lake processor in the flesh with four separate chiplets inside the package is fascinating, especially given that some or all of the parts of that processor are surely vertically-stacked. That’s the point of Foveros, after all.

How are cpus actually made

Image: Commercial Times

What’s new is this report from Taiwan’s Commercial Times that seems to state that Meteor Lake processors will have their CPU cores fabbed on Intel’s own “Intel 4” process, but that the GPU and I/O tiles will be fabbed by TSMC. Specifically, the report claims that the I/O tiles (which contain the memory controller, PCIe 5.0 interface, USB controllers, and so on) will be fabbed on TSMC’s 5nm (or 4nm) process, while the Xe-LP Gen12.7-based GPU tiles will be fabbed on TSMC’s 3nm process.

How are cpus actually made

Intel could shore up one of its biggest weak points with CPUs in that next-gen Raptor Lake processors might advance considerably in terms of power-efficiency.

As you may be aware, power usage has been something Intel has struggled with in recent times, and Alder Lake – while admittedly being better than its predecessor Rocket Lake – still looks power-hungry compared to Ryzen 5000 chips (and particularly the 12900K, with the flagship chip once again remaining a Watt-guzzling monster).

Raptor Lake could change that, though, thanks to a fresh innovation which the rumor mill reckons (apply salt here) might just pop up in time for the 13th-gen chips, spotted in an Intel patent.

As Tom’s Hardware reports, Twitter user Underfox pointed out the Intel patent in a tweet (a while back – actually in August) and described how it aims to reduce power usage.

The basic idea behind Raptor Lake’s new power delivery architecture proposal is to include a digital linear voltage regulator (DLVR) as a voltage clamp placing in parallel to the primary VR, reducing CPU VID and thereby also reducing processor core power consumption. pic.twitter.com/n7kwjwTY9CAugust 19, 2021

The DLVR (digital linear voltage regulator) power delivery system is a “voltage clamp placing in parallel to the primary VR [voltage regulator]” which reduces the CPU VID (the voltage the CPU requires to be delivered) and therefore power consumption of processor cores.

That power-efficiency improvement could amount to a 20% to 25% decrease in the power needed by the CPU, and that may translate to a roughly 7% performance gain.

The enhancement comes at only a “small extra cost for the silicon, low complexity of tuning, and a relatively small additional motherboard VR”, Intel asserts.

Analysis: Efficiency, efficiency, efficiency – is Intel poised for major laptop success?

Raptor Lake is thought to be arriving later in 2022 to take the baton from the freshly released Alder Lake chips. It’s expected to be a simple refresh of Alder Lake, but will obviously sport performance gains in terms of IPC (Instructions per Clock), with a flagship that’s rumored to run with 24-cores (8 performance cores plus 16 efficiency cores, which as the latter don’t have hyper-threading means 32-threads in total).

Better power-efficiency for Raptor Lake would clearly be good news, because as we already mentioned, power consumption is an area Intel has continued to struggle with keeping a lid on while eking more performance from its chips in recent generations.

Where this could be particularly exciting is with mobile CPUs, as if the rumor mill is correct, Raptor Lake is going to really push with the efficiency cores (with 16 in the flagship, doubling up from 8 in Alder Lake), and on top of that, we could have an overall improvement with power-efficiency in the underlying architecture, too.

That’s a prospective double whammy which might mean that Raptor Lake laptop CPUs could promise huge battery life boosts as a result – assuming that this patent is indeed for tech which will be ready and in Intel’s next-gen processors.

The chart below shows official prices of AMD FX-8300, FX-8320, FX-8320E and FX-8150 processors:

FX-8320 Overclocking

Sorry, overclocking information for this processor is not available at this time.

Related news stories

AMD FX-8320 Benchmarks and Performance evaluation

For FX-8320 charts, comparing multi- and single-threaded performance of this microprocessor with other FX-Series processors and the fastest AMD and Intel x86 chips, please visit AMD FX-8320 multi-threaded and single-threaded performance pages.

For averaged performance in integer, floating-point, SIMD and memory-intensive applications please see the next section.

Integer, Floating-Point, SIMD and Memory performance

Benchmarked processor:

CPU ID: 600F20
CPU vendor string: AuthenticAMD
CPU name string: AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor

Integer performance

Floating Point performance

MMX / SSE / SSE2 performance

Memory-intensive program performance

CPU ID information for the FX-8320

Detailed characteristics of processor’s internals, including x86 instruction set extensions and individual instructions, high- and low-level technologies, are listed below. This list was acquired from an actual AMD FX-Series FX-8320 processor with the help of the x86 CPUID instruction. Any discrepancies between CPUID features and official specifications are likely due to some features being disabled in BIOS, or due to a bug in our CPUID decoding algorithm.

Our CPUID database contains 16 records for this microprocessor. See all submitted records.

Use our CPU identification tool to check features of your processor.

CPUs, related to AMD FX-8320

The list of related CPUs does not include all models. For the complete list, please see the related “Piledriver” processors for socket AM3+ page.

How are cpus actually made

For the buyer intent on the very latest and greatest CPU, your choice comes down to Intel’s 11th-gen Tiger Lake H, or AMD’s Ryzen 5000. Both families offer spectacular performance that steps away from that of their predecessors.

For deeper details, check our our Tiger Lake H review and our Ryzen 5000 review. But you’re probably here because you don’t want to read through several thousand words and a pile of comparison charts. That’s fine—we’ve put in the hours of testing and can give you the gist so you can make an informed buying decision.

While some want to see one CPU declared a winner, it’s never quite that easy. Instead, you need to think about what you want to do with this laptop. Do you play games 99 percent of the time? Work unplugged for hours? Do you do photo or video editing? Are you making your own movie with 3D animation? You’ll want to pick the CPU whose strengths overlap best with what you do.

Which is best for general use?

If your idea of laptop use is to sit on the couch or kitchen and browse the web, watch videos, and run Microsoft Office or Google Docs all day, we would point you to the “U-class” of laptops. For AMD, these will be denoted with U at the end of a model number, such as Ryzen 7 5800U; and for Intel it’ll typically have a G7 or G4, such as Core i7-1165G7 or Core i3-1125G4. Both U and G indicate CPUs made for lower-power consumption roles and are typically found in very thin, ultra-light laptops.

These laptops almost always offer the very best balance of weight-to-performance ratio. While they aren’t quite as fast as “H-class” laptops, they’re surprisingly close for general use. Besides being lighter, they also tend to be quieter, as there’s less hardware to keep cool.

Both Intel’s 11th-gen Tiger Lake and AMD’s Ryzen 5000 are very closely matched for general use, but AMD’s Ryzen 5000U actually has the slight edge: In our tests, the top-end Ryzen 7 5800U is faster than the top-end Core i7-1185G7. Intel has since introduced a newer Core i7-1195G7 that may change that, but basically think for general use, you can’t lose with either Intel or AMD U-class CPUs. The more powerful H-class cousins of these CPUs, for heavier-duty laptops, are fully capable as well.

Recommendation: Both are good, but U-class Ryzen 5000 has a slight edge.

Which is best for video editing?

For a laptop used primarily for video editing, it’s actually a pretty close race. While you can indeed do a surprising amount of video editing on a U-class laptop compared to just a few years ago, we recommend that you stick to an H-class laptop CPU with a discrete graphics card.

How are cpus actually made

The AMD E1-6010 is a very basic processor for inexpensive laptops. Featuring two cores, a clock speed of only 1.35GHz, and 1MB of cache, the E1-6010 “Beema” APU can’t offer anything but entry-level performance. In fact, it is one of the slowest notebook-use CPUs on the market today, as you can see in the PassMark benchmark comparison chart.

However, it can be used for the daily chores and provides an acceptable experience if you don’t do anything too complex on it and don’t multitask too much. Just like the competing Intel Celeron N2820/N2830/N2840 series CPUs we reviewed recently.

In the video below, you can see what doing everyday light tasks on a laptop with the E1-6010 looks like. It’s a Dell Inspiron 3541 series configuration with 4GB of RAM and a mechanical hard drive. Scrolling through web pages is quite smooth, as well as switching between a couple of opened apps – YouTube video in Internet explorer, a text document in WordPad, and a 5MP image in Paint.net. YouTube 1080p-resolution videos play without a glitch. The aforementioned Intel Celerons provide a bit snappier experience, but overall the E1-6010 has a real life performance very close to them.

As for gaming, the Radeon R2 is also similar to the Intel HD integrated graphics used in the Celeron chips. This means playable frame rates only in less demanding games on lower graphics settings and low 720p resolution. Under these conditions, our test showed playable are League of Legends, Counter Strike: Global Offensive, and Team Fortress 2, all running at about 25 fps.



However, in some titles the E1-6010 / Radeon R2 performed unexpectedly bad. Among the tested games, in Dota 2 and Minecraft in particular. Due to some reason, the frame rates on the lowest settings and 720p resolution were around 10fps in Dota 2 and around 15 fps in Minecraft most of the time. It appears the CPU clock speed of 1.35GHz throttles the system in these games. On the other hand, Minecraft and Dota 2 are playable on the Celeron CPUs at above 20 fps.

Performance of the E1-6010 is sacrificed big time in interest of lower costs, better power efficiency, and lower heat. The processor consumes 10 Watts, which is below consumption of the popular Intel Core series chips with 15W or greater TDP, but still above the Celeron N-series with 7.5W TDP. The E1 runs quite cool. In the tested notebook, the CPU temperatures were between 40 degrees Celsius on idle and up to 60 degrees under heavy stress. The laptop itself stayed almost cold most of the time with fans blowing only occasionally on low and quiet rotating speeds.

All in all, the E1-6010 review shows us that even the cheapest notebooks with slowest CPUs on the current market are usable machines, which perform the daily web, office, and multimedia tasks at acceptable speeds and even run some lighter games.

How are cpus actually made

Update: The E1-6015 is an updated version of the same chip. The only difference between the 6010 and 6015 are their clock speeds of 1.35 and 1.4 MHz, respectively, without any noticeable impact on performance.

Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors. The scores and real-world performance of the AMD E1-6010 and compared CPUs may vary depending on the notebooks’ other components, settings, cooling, and other factors. However, the benchmark results are good indicators of the processors’ performance.

Specifications of the AMD E1-6010

Here’s the specs sheet of the AMD E1-6010:

Processor Name AMD E1-6010
CPU Family AMD E1-Series "Beema"
Number of Cores Dual-core / 1 computing thread per core
CPU Clock Speed 1.35GHz
Cache Size 1MB
Memory Support DDR3 (1333 MHz max. speed)
Integrated Graphics AMD Radeon R2 Series
Power Consumption 10W
Production Technology 28-nanometer
Notable Technologies AMD-V virtualization
Typical Use Affordable laptops & 2-in-1 PCs

Published on October 30, 2014

User Reviews and Q&A on the AMD E1-6010

Below you can read and submit user reviews, questions, and answers about the processor. Thank you for your contribution.